Notes for Azed 2,770

There are usually one or two points of interest in an Azed puzzle, and here we pick them out for comment. Please feel free to add your own questions or observations on any aspect of the puzzle (including clues not listed below) either by using the comment form at the bottom of the page or, if would prefer that your question/comment is not publicly visible, by email.

Azed 2,770 Plain

Difficulty rating: 2 out of 5 stars (2 / 5)

It’s the first Sunday of the month, it’s an Azed, and…it’s not a clue writing competition. There seems to be a degree of confusion, in that the version printed in the paper invites us to submit a clue to replace the asterisked definition, but there is no such definition; with the help of correspondent Andrew, I subsequently located the note buried  at the bottom of page 29 of the main newspaper, which says “The next clue-writing competition will be with Azed 2771.” The online entry form, though, makes things pretty clear: “Please note this is a prize draw puzzle, not a clue writing competition. The next clue writing competition will be Azed 2,771 on October 5th 2025.” But why? Since it’s not too hard to replace one of the cryptic clues with a definition from Chambers and put a star next to the clue number, I’m guessing that the hiatus is designed to allow time for more changes to be made to the clue judging process ‘behind the scenes’.

By the standards of recent Azed plains (and there haven’t been any other sorts) I thought this one was pretty close to the middle of the difficulty spectrum; there were only a couple of clues which I could imagine giving any problems to regular solvers. The puzzle was perhaps a little lacking in élan, with a few rather strange surface readings and some rather loose definitions, but it was quite entertaining and the clues were generally sound.

Setters’ Corner: This week I’m going to look at clue 29a, “Woody street remained undisturbed (6)”. The wordplay is straightforward, with the two-letter abbreviation for ‘Street’ being followed by the four-letter past active tense of a verb meaning ‘to remain undisturbed or unchanged’ (as in “I think we’ll just let it ????”). The definition ‘Woody’ references the nickname of the American athlete and actor Woodrow Wilson Woolwine ??????, a decathlete and American football star who went on to be nominated for a Golden Globe Award for his role in Spartacus (for Best Supporting Actor, so presumably he was the one who wasn’t Spartacus). But is ‘Woody’ on its own sufficient to indicate this? The simple answer is ‘No’. It is a variation on the definition by example, and requires some form of indication. Normally this would take the form of a qualifier either before or after the core definition, or a question mark immediately following it. But none of these can be used here without destroying the surface reading. In ‘Perhaps Woody street…’ the capital letter on ‘Woody’ sticks out like a sore thumb, while ‘Woody, perhaps, street’ or the like is very weak. The definition isn’t at the end of the clue, so the question mark is not an option. This is one of those times when an interesting idea should probably have been abandoned on the grounds that it cannot be turned into a clue which combines artist merit with fairness to the solver.

Across

4a Give out helping but not on those cut? (8)
A four-letter word meaning ‘[to] give out’ is followed by a six-letter word for a helping deprived of (‘but not’) the consecutive letters ON. The cut is of the unkindest sort.

13a Basically gold-loving (6, 2 words)
The chemical symbol for gold and a word meaning ‘loving’ combine to produce the (2,4) answer.

14a Sort of muffler Western lawman used to wrap colt, active? (6)
The four-letter surname of a famous character from the American West contains (‘used to wrap’) the single-letter abbreviations for ‘colt’ and ‘active’. Together with his brother Virgil and Doc Holliday, this lawman formed the ‘enforcement’ team in the gunfight at the OK Corral, and he is probably the only person whose Wikipedia entry describes him as “lawman, buffalo hunter, saloon keeper, miner, brothel keeper, and boxing referee.” As a correspondent notes, Chambers offers very little support for the definition here.

16a Daub showing girl in pub (7)
A four-letter given name is contained by a three-letter word for a pub. The name is, I suspect, more often given to girls than boys these days, but it always puts me straight in mind of the Saki story with that title, where the Baroness suggests bestowing the name on an escaped hyena of uncertain sex which she and Constance Broddle (“one of those strapping florid girls that go so well with autumn scenery or Christmas decorations in church”) encounter on a hunt, surrounded by a dozen hounds who “had broken away from the rest of the pack on the trail of this alien scent…and were not quite sure how to treat their quarry now they had got him.”

“The hyena hailed our approach with unmistakable relief and demonstrations of friendliness.  It had probably been accustomed to uniform kindness from humans, while its first experience of a pack of hounds had left a bad impression. The hounds looked more than ever embarrassed as their quarry paraded its sudden intimacy with us, and the faint toot of a horn in the distance was seized on as a welcome signal for unobtrusive departure.” From then on, things don’t go too well for anyone except, needless to say, the Baroness herself.

19a Sweet clubs left out, small portion (4)
A five-letter, primarily musical, term meaning ‘sweet’ (and a word that might precede ‘vita’) has the usual abbreviation for ‘clubs’ omitted (‘left out’).

21a Abstainer – what shreds etc will be swallowed by one such (7)
An anagram of ETC is contained by a single-letter word meaning ‘one’ and a three-letter Latin word for ‘such’ or ‘thus’ usually, like the Irish in 1066 and All That, found living in brackets. How do we feel about ‘what shreds etc’ indicating an anagram of ETC? Personally, I’m not too keen, although I wouldn’t have any problem with “what’s shredded etc”.

27a One of the goosefoots, article brought in to cool (6, 2 words)
A three-letter article of the definite kind is contained by (‘brought in to’) a three-letter word meaning ‘[to] cool’, the result being a (3,3) term for ‘any one of various fat-leaved plants, esp of the goosefoot family.’

Down

4d Inveterate flirt embracing e.g. Italian sculptor (8)
There’s one of those ‘invisicommas’ here, between the ‘e.g.’ and the ‘Italian’, since it is the six-letter surname of an Italian sculptor which is containing (’embracing’) a two-letter word meaning ‘for instance (ie ‘e.g.’). 

7d Set of nets without opening split (4)
A five-letter word for a set of fishing nets (or a very large group of snowflakes indeed) loses its first letter (‘without opening’).

8d ’Ow ’Arry might refer to a cavity for lizard (5)
A (2,3) expression representing how an ‘aitch-dropper’ might refer to a cavity leads to the solution; coincidentally, I found myself clueing the plural form of the word just a few days ago.

12d Artist’s instrument (not cherished) – one may draw staves (7)
The usual two-letter abbreviation suggested by ‘artist’ and the apostrophe-s are followed by a seven-letter musical instrument from which a three-letter word meaning ‘cherished’ has been removed (‘not cherished’).

15d Typical of Byron, misused date introducing insolence (7)
An anagram (‘misused’) of DATE contains (‘introducing’) a three-letter word for ‘insolence’. Lord Byron, Dudley Moore and Steven Gerrard are examples of those who have been born with the particular congenital deformity referenced here. Every week, the Birmingham Evening Mail used to print a Schools Crossword, a non-cryptic puzzle submitted by a pupil from a school in the area. My first published crossword appeared in this series; sadly, the puzzle itself has been lost to posterity, and the only answer which I remember from it is the one here.

17d Member of school rarely removing page from journal (8)
The nine-letter name of the oldest surviving magazine in the world, first published in 1828 and with past editors including Nigel Lawson and Boris Johnson, has the usual abbreviation for ‘page’ omitted (‘removing page from journal’) to produce a term, shown by Chambers as ‘rare’, for an adherent of a school or party.

25d What’ll denote home for Seabee, filled with energy and exercises (4)
The three-letter abbreviation for the sort of vessel which a Seabee might call home, or perhaps more likely might call their place of work, contains (‘filled with’) the usual abbreviation for ‘energy’.

26d What’s involved in fencing with wax (4)
The usual single-letter abbreviation for ‘with’ is followed by a word suggested by wax3 in Chambers, an ‘old informal’ word for a fit of anger. The definition seems a bit, well, definite – I think that something like “What might be involved in fencing” would be preferable.

(definitions are underlined)

You may also like...

23 Responses

  1. Wil Ransome says:

    We haven’t (apparently, at any rate) had the slip for July. Nor have we had the slip for August, even that one well past the day on which we usually have it. It does seem that the judging process is becoming too much for Azed. I accept that he’s produced a crossword every week for well over 50 years and is entitled to a bit of a holiday, but the situation is becoming absurd. It looks to me as if The Observer is just trying to see there isn’t a constant backlog.

    Am I being particularly harsh?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi Wil

      I think your point is fair; the number of changes, their timing, and the obvious ‘teething troubles’ with the new submission mechanism for competition clues have combined to produce a situation that is less than satisfactory. The published results for the August comp are credible, and the associated Slip is promised ‘within the next fortnight’, so we will see…

      I find it equally concerning that since all Azed puzzles should now be linked to clue writing competitions, a puzzle without an asterisked definition has come out this week. Clearly the Observer team were aware of a problem, hence the notes on page 29 of the paper, but if the error was simply the lack of an asterisked clue, why not say that solvers are required to submit their own clue to replace the one for 26d (or whatever?). The other interpretation is that judging one puzzle per month is too much for Azed, which is something that surely needs to be addressed posthaste.

      It is also disappointing that of the last 30 puzzles (Azed and Gemelo) only one has been a ‘special’ requiring anything from the solver beyond solving normal clues and entering their answers in the grid. The Ximenes and Azed series have been marked out by the regular appearance of such specials (7 per year used to be standard, but last year the number had dropped to 4), and I had hoped that if Azed was now finding them a bit of a strain to produce then Gemelo would step into the breach, either with some established favourites or a new invention or two of his own.

    • Andrew Shields says:

      I have a hunch that there was some sort of mess-up with the July competition.

      As has been noted, the list of names of July’s winners/VHCs was somewhat unexpected. The August winners/VHCs published this weekend, in contrast, had a more familiar look. I wonder if the mechanism to match submitted clues to entrants for the July competition didn’t work properly? Hence the long and unexplained delay in producing the slip, which many of us are very keen to see.

      More generally, in answer to your question, I don’t think you’re being harsh. Even though the clue-writing comp is a niche activity, it is associated with a national media outlet and needs to be run properly.

      I can’t possibly know how Azed feels (and recently he had a perfect opportunity to call it a day completely, and no one would have been surprised) but I’ve sensed a waning enthusiasm in recent years. The lack of variety in competition puzzle types; the rather unforgiveable error of awarding a prize to an ineligible entry and never acknowledging it; and, most of all, the decline in quality of the slip. When I started entering, the slip usually included a commentary on submitted clues, picking out both strengths and weaknesses and highlighting unsoundness, with the aim of helping us all write better clues. Now, it’s barely more than a few lines saying which of Azed’s clues was the favourite among entrants.

      We’ve been asked to cut The Observer a bit of slack during the transition period, but for how much longer?

      • Andrew Shields says:

        Dr Clue, we were clearly both writing responses at the same time!

        • Doctor Clue says:

          I thought that our comments dovetailed very nicely!

          • Andrew Shields says:

            Just received, in the latest Crossword Centre email:

            Disappointment for clue-writers when the Azed crossword on September 7 was a prize draw puzzle with no clue to write. I am worried about what is going on at the Observer since it was taken over by tortoise. In answer to the many emails I have received, there was no Azed Slip for July. I will post the August slip if it is published.

            Penultimate sentence the important one. Surely there must have been a foul-up with the July puzzle…

            • Doctor Clue says:

              Since Tortoise took over, we’ve had a puzzle reliably available online every Sunday morning, an online completion option, a mechanism for online submission of entries for both standard and clue writing comp puzzles, and an excellent new setter. All good. It is clear from solver feedback and the clues published in the Observer that things went awry with the July competition; personally, I’m quite happy to write off that comp and move on. However, what we did have in the past was a stability (in terms of clue writing comps, specials, publication of results/slips) that no longer exists. Like you, I get the feeling that it’s all getting more and more burdensome for Azed, and that perhaps the time is right for him to draw down the curtain on a most extraordinary career, to hand all the setting reins to Gemelo, and for a new judge to be appointed for the clue writing competitions, since there is no reason why the puzzle setter should carry the extra load of adjudication and slip writing – producing a good puzzle week in week out is a hard enough job.

              • Crossguesser says:

                Was it the case that because of a communications snafu, the July contest winners were mistakenly awarded randomly as if it were a non clue-writing draw and it was too late to correct it with the names published? Sorry if that’s already been implied.

                I know Azed isn’t getting any younger, but I don’t see why he can’t continue to set a puzzle, including Specials, and judge 150 clues just once a month. The problem may be that with all the publicity of the change to online submissions, and no one having to spend £1.65 for a 1st class stamp and make an effort to post an entry (do most people even own envelopes in 2025? 😄), the number of entrants increased by much more than was anticipated. That might even have informed a decision to assign winners randomly, rather than it being a silly error. Also, Azed’s having been abroad recently is another delayer.

                I wonder who has the monthly winner’s cup at the moment?

                • Doctor Clue says:

                  I think there can come a point where the problem is not the frequency with which a particular task is to be carried out but the task itself.

  2. MuchPuzzled says:

    Given that I managed to complete this without peeking at this website, this week’s offering is thankfully much more accessible than those of late.
    Thanks for expanding upon 29A where the definition of “Woody” is hopelessly vague – glad I’m not the only one who hasn’t heard of this person! In contrast, “Western lawman” @ 14A is much more user-friendly, though I’m not sure about the abbreviation for “colt” – is this a misprint which should read “cold”?

    • Jay says:

      C is shown as an accepted abbreviation for colt. I assume in the horse sense, perhaps as horse racing short hand. Of course here we are supposed to think of the revolver.

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi MP

      Yes, I think the ‘Western lawman’ is entirely fair, in contrast to ‘Woody’, who is a woodpecker, an actor (and bartender in Cheers), a film director, a jazzman, or one of the Bay City Rollers .

      ‘Colt’ for C is in Chambers, and its presence is just one more example of the inconsistencies in the abbreviations therein. The racecard abbreviations ‘ch’ for ‘chestnut’ and ‘gr’ for ‘grey’ are also listed, but not ‘g’ for gelding, ‘f’ for ‘filly’, ‘m’ for ‘mare’ or ‘b’ for ‘bay’.

      • MuchPuzzled says:

        Aha! Caught out by having an old Chambers again – which does not list any of these racecard abbreviations, and for which I am not upgrading until a sparkly new edition is published.
        Not sure whether to be impressed that you know that ‘Woody’ was one of the Bay City Rollers – its another point of trivia that I have wilfully forgotten! 😁

  3. Jay says:

    Many thanks for the analysis, always appreciated. I’m pleased you picked on 29a because I was also perplexed by the lack of indication for the definition by example.
    My last one in was 2d as landing of the definition required all the crossers. I wondered about the use of “what” and thought that “that” might have read better and then why the need for the “?” . Perhaps it’s just a stylistic choice?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      I think that 2d is a weak clue. Apart from the definition being distinctly iffy, and ‘inspires’ suggesting an action rather than a steady state, only a setter with an aversion to links between definition and wordplay could reasonably have preferred the wording as it is here to something like ‘…that inspires…’ or (better) ‘…that’s inspired…’, but Azed’s never previously shown signs of such an aversion.

  4. Hilary Jarrett says:

    19a surely C for club omitted?

  5. Tony McCoy O'Grady says:

    19a – surely it is not the abbreviation for ‘left’ which is omitted.

  6. Andrew Wardrop says:

    In 20a is the second ‘the’ a superfluous word in a ‘hidden’ clue? I agree with all you say about 29a, and wonder whether the definition should also be criticised for obscurity. Or am I just not as polymathic as Azed?

    • Doctor Clue says:

      Hi Andrew

      In On the Art of the Crossword, Ximenes wrote that in ‘hiddens’ “no word other than an article should occur in the hiding place that does not contain at least one letter of the required word”. I have never understood this exemption, and I would never include an ‘unused article’ in one of my own clues, but when commenting on CJ Morse’s first-placed clue for KISS in comp 1,823 (“X in ‘billet-doux’ and the ilk is silent”), Azed observed, “In case anyone wonders, I accept that the definite article can be included to introduce the ‘container’ in a hidden clue without being regarded as part of it.” He and I must agree to differ on that one.

      In 29a, I thought that ‘Woody’ without qualification was woefully inadequate, particularly given that there are several Woodys that I suggest would be better known to most solvers than this one, whom I hadn’t heard of either.

Leave a Reply to Tony McCoy O'Grady Cancel reply

All fields must be completed. Your email address will not be published.